Sony Nintendo or Microsoft?

[Ham and Cheese]

Argh, just because games are rated M DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE GOOD.

Christ, so narrow-minded.

[Hypocrisy is Fun]

Originally Posted by vgbri

I only know 1 adult that plays videogames. But still adults play games but kids play them more often.

You've never played Xbox Live. >_____>

I play tons of adults, and alot of them seem to be high.

@ NGA: Lots of good games are T :)

Sure not all games rated M are good, but most of them are.

[Ham and Cheese]

Oh yeah, I mean, what good game ISN'T rated T nowadays?

It's just that when people judge a game's quality based on its rating, it's just so...stupid.

[Firefox]

Wow, I have video game systems from each company. I really don't think I'd be able to choose... :/

[vgbri]

Originally Posted by Ham and Cheese

Oh yeah, I mean, what good game ISN'T rated T nowadays?

It's just that when people judge a game's quality based on its rating, it's just so...stupid.

I like all rated games but 90% of my games are T and they are the best games I've ever played but still Halo and Kingdom Hearts are loads of fun so I usualy don't judge a game by it's rating. I look it up on the internet and read the forums on Gamespot.com before I go shopping.

[Kenny_C.002]

Originally Posted by Dakota

Who cares? I don't buy games because of the company it comes from. I buy good games. These stupid "Xbox/PS2/Nintendo sux! Xbox/PS2/Nintendo rules!" fanboys drive me insane because they simply cannot think for themselves.

Games companies want this stupid "You can only like one of us" ideology because it sells their product. Just buy the games you like from whichever company it would happen to come from.

Agreed. I still have no idea why people are rooting for a company or not. This isn't a sport, you know.

Originally Posted by Hypocrisy Is Fun!

They're all differnt, comparing them is stupid.

Aside from the fact that M$ and Sony are competing for the same niche in the maturing genres industry, yes you are right.

Originally Posted by InvertrevnI

Apple computers=t3h PWNzorz.

I can do simply incredible things by manipulting my OS. ask my about Scripting them.

Linux. I think that already killed everything else. XD

[bigbadblaziken]

i say sony because hands down they will always have the best graphics but the most xpensive systtems micrsoft is stupid and nintendo is surviving only because of their hand held systems

[crystal_wolf]

I would've said that i liked all of them, but I played 2 of sony's online games( everquest, everquest 2) and they were pretty cool with the graphics and all

[Kenny_C.002]

Originally Posted by bigbadblaziken

i say sony because hands down they will always have the best graphics but the most xpensive systtems micrsoft is stupid and nintendo is surviving only because of their hand held systems

So basically you're saying that you're willing to pay more than the price of the other two systems combined for the power of a system that is not even close to 1.5 times more powerful than both the other systems combined?

Understand that this isn't about graphics anymore. I looked at gameplay graphics of an Xbox 360 and already it's gotten so real that really the only things you can improve upon are the individual strands of hair or how the blood would splatter across the screen. Does that really matter that much?

And you claim that Microsoft is stupid. Can you back that statment up instead of just spewing it out? Hey, I'm not particularly fond of Microsoft myself, but it's for valid reasons on their Windows platform. This has no relation with the Xbox 360, and I won't let that cloud my judgement of the system. However, stating that Microsoft is stupid is obviously not a valid reason for not liking a system.

Nintendo has always been known for their success in handhelds and having low-budget "genre kings" (thanks Danc) like Animal Crossing. It's been proven that Nintendo's strategy of innovation is the driving force behind the company's profit. They have no need to refine an already established genre, nor should they, since the cost of development increases exponentially while the revenue decreases over the genre's maturity. Take for example GTA. I can safely say that GTA 3 had been the best seller of all of the Rockstar's takes on the series. Why? GTA 3 innovative. It was new. Everybody wants a piece of it. GTA: Vice City? Pretty much the same thing, except better graphics and what not. The initial lure of GTA 3 is already lost, and the franchise has been shown to slowly lose sales. This is true of all genres. Nintendo, by breaking out into creating other genres, continue to make low-budget, high revenue games, and are raking in the profits that way. The move to the Wii was no surprise. It was new, innovative, and generally created the same feel that GTA 3 had. Low-budget, high profit.

[Jet]

I luv all!!! ;3 I voted allzzz!!! /sarcasm <crap I did vote =/>

its not a good idea to compare those, because it's all about the games... If Pokémon was in Sony, would you like Sony better? if... some famous sony character (can't think of any right now... as if Crash Bandicoot is...) is in Nintendo, would you like Nintendo more?

[RedRoninMan]

Nintendo will always be my favorite.

[Dilop]

Nintendo provides the best games, in my opinion.

[GaryEX]

Originally Posted by Firefox

Wow, I have video game systems from each company. I really don't think I'd be able to choose... :/

Dude, you are so lucky!

[Hypocrisy is Fun]

Originally Posted by Kenny_C.002

Aside from the fact that M$ and Sony are competing for the same niche in the maturing genres industry, yes you are right.

[Oz Ranger]

Beyond a shadow of a doubt, Nintendo. They are most consistent with the amount of fantastic games they pump out, so they deserve the products to be bought.