| Pokemon: X and Y Discuss the upcoming games Pokemon X and Pokemon Y here. Be sure to label posts with spoilers and use spoiler tags when necessary. |

01-14-2013, 03:49 PM
|
 |
~Blast Burn
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New Bark Town
Posts: 5,956
|
|
What You Want to See in the Starters
Since the types for the starters were announced, what do you want to see in the evolutions of the starters? What types do you wanna see? What animal do you want to see them based on? What moves do you want them to be able to use?
For me, I'm hoping Fennekin becomes Fire/Ground, Fire/Electric, or just plain Fire typed. I want it to be able to use the same moves as Typhlosion; Eruption, Flame Charge, Wild Charge, Lava Plume, etc. Hopefully Fennekin will keep it's animal as the Fennec Fox. <3
Also, for those who don't know yet, the starters are pure typed. No secondary types.
Last edited by Typhlosion Explosion; 01-14-2013 at 03:52 PM.
|

01-14-2013, 06:47 PM
|
 |
~VRAAHBRBRBR!~
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Forum Board Number 124
Posts: 3,957
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
It is likely that Froakie will evolve into a Water/Ice type, judging by it's use of Ice Beam in a screenshot.
|

01-14-2013, 06:51 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,142
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
I was pretty sure that I saw Froakie use Hydro Pump and Faint Attack.
|

01-14-2013, 07:00 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 8,969
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
Frokie has a best bet being ground or we might get supprise and it's a flying genie toad.
I hope the starters get a nice final typing thta makes them popular as comeptivly as they they are out side of that relm but if the fox shares victini's typing, they end up ugly or another mon out classes them, that might not happen
|

01-14-2013, 07:12 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,142
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
I highly doubt and pray that there will be no Fire/Fighting and no Water/Ground. I'm gonna give Gamefreak a little credit and say that they aren't that redundant. Based of Froakie's white mane, I'm going to say he will not be part ground.
I'd prefer pure water over part ground. I'd love Water/Dark, Water/Dragon, Water/Flying, Even Water/Poison.
|

01-14-2013, 07:19 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 8,969
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roze
I highly doubt and pray that there will be no Fire/Fighting and no Water/Ground. I'm gonna give Gamefreak a little credit and say that they aren't that redundant. Based of Froakie's white mane, I'm going to say he will not be part ground.
I'd prefer pure water over part ground. I'd love Water/Dark, Water/Dragon, Water/Flying, Even Water/Poison.
|
out the them is likely water/flying. the fox will not be a fighting type.
|

01-14-2013, 08:10 PM
|
 |
~Blast Burn
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New Bark Town
Posts: 5,956
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roze
|
Fennekin could be Fire/Fighting. No one knows. Froakie could end up pure Water. I'd also dread a Water/Ground.
Froakie looked to me like he was using Ice Beam and some Electric-Type move.
|

01-14-2013, 08:13 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 8,969
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
Quote:
Originally Posted by Typhlosion Explosion
Fennekin could be Fire/Fighting. No one knows. Froakie could end up pure Water. I'd also dread a Water/Ground.
Froakie looked to me like he was using Ice Beam and some Electric-Type move.
|
why must you argue with everything i sya on such matters? no the fox won't be a fighting type odd say as the animal the fox it dosn't have the build of a fighting type.
|

01-14-2013, 08:28 PM
|
 |
~Blast Burn
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New Bark Town
Posts: 5,956
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master Aqua
why must you argue with everything i sya on such matters? no the fox won't be a fighting type odd say as the animal the fox it dosn't have the build of a fighting type.
|
Neither did Torchic. They can change up the design.
I'm just saying NO ONE outside Gamefreak knows. You can guess on their evolutions, but you CANNOT claim to know 100%.
|

01-14-2013, 08:36 PM
|
 |
Drasconis Deviantus
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Voids of my mind
Posts: 6,522
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master Aqua
why must you argue with everything i sya on such matters? no the fox won't be a fighting type odd say as the animal the fox it dosn't have the build of a fighting type.
|
Emboar is a flaming pig and can learn Scald. Sense where?
Keldeo has the build of a small unicorn and it's a fighting type. How does that work?
Toxicroak looks more fitting to be Poison/Dark but it's Poison/Fighting and learns far more Dark moves than fighting moves. ><
Galvantula's dex entries says it can create barriers with it's electric thread but it can't learn Barrier or Reflect, only Light Screen. [NINTENDO FIX THIS]
You can't base typing and things mased on moves and what the Pokemon is based off of. Pokemon can throw in the random thing in there that doesn't make sense.
ANYWAY.
I'm hoping Chespin is Grass/Rock. If it turns into something like a mole that would be awesome. I'd like a nice mole Pokemon that's not Excadrill. Excadrill bores me.
__________________
Code:
VPP STATS
Paired with: Sandstorm Lavastone <3

Neon the Jolteon
Level100: 6576
Last edited by Saraibre Ryu; 01-14-2013 at 08:39 PM.
|

01-14-2013, 08:49 PM
|
 |
~Blast Burn
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New Bark Town
Posts: 5,956
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saraibre Ryu
Emboar is a flaming pig and can learn Scald. Sense where?
|
OMG HA HA I JUST NOTICED THAT
Excadrill is boring. It's uglehhh. No uglies for me no thanks.
As long as Fennekin remains cute through out it's evolutionary line, I'm picking it, I don't care what the type is, move sets, nuh-uh. As long as it's still cute. Even if it becomes (in my opinion) ugly, then I just won't evolve it. <3
|

01-14-2013, 09:51 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 8,969
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
Quote:
Originally Posted by Typhlosion Explosion
OMG HA HA I JUST NOTICED THAT
Excadrill is boring. It's uglehhh. No uglies for me no thanks.
As long as Fennekin remains cute through out it's evolutionary line, I'm picking it, I don't care what the type is, move sets, nuh-uh. As long as it's still cute. Even if it becomes (in my opinion) ugly, then I just won't evolve it. <3
|
i did say odd are fighting is an unlikely type for a fox. I really wish the ebst for these starters as 5th gens were such a disaster in my opinion all outclassed and useless and honestly asphetically not that great. Only serperior has a redmining factor in it's non existant Dream world ability.
|

01-14-2013, 11:08 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Your front door with a loaded P90
Posts: 7,532
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
Quote:
Originally Posted by Typhlosion Explosion
Since the types for the starters were announced, what do you want to see in the evolutions of the starters? What types do you wanna see? What animal do you want to see them based on? What moves do you want them to be able to use?
For me, I'm hoping Fennekin becomes Fire/Ground, Fire/Electric, or just plain Fire typed. I want it to be able to use the same moves as Typhlosion; Eruption, Flame Charge, Wild Charge, Lava Plume, etc. Hopefully Fennekin will keep it's animal as the Fennec Fox. <3
Also, for those who don't know yet, the starters are pure typed. No secondary types.
|
Well what did you expect? Ever since Gen I all the starters have been single-typed except for Bulbasaur
I'd love a Fire/Electric Fennekin evo as it could prove a nice troll to the Froakie family (as long as, hopefully, it isn't a Ground-type)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roze
|
ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY ARCEUS BLEEDING NO
I will ABSOLUTELY NOT tolerate a psychic starter! There are too many Psychic types in existance as is. At least every generation we get a flooding of Psychic-type Pokémon, especially legendaries, who are either overpowerered trolls (evident the most in Red and Blue), or crap to use with their dangerously hindering weaknesses to Dark, Ghost, and Bug (as in every following Generation).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etymology
It is likely that Froakie will evolve into a Water/Ice type, judging by it's use of Ice Beam in a screenshot.
|
Most Water-types use Ice-type moves as a Grass-type counter. Just because Froakie used an Ice-type move doesn't make it an Ice-type Pokémon
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roze
I was pretty sure that I saw Froakie use Hydro Pump and Faint Attack.
|
Both very possible. Neither would necessarily hint to its evolution types though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roze
I highly doubt and pray that there will be no Fire/Fighting and no Water/Ground. I'm gonna give Gamefreak a little credit and say that they aren't that redundant. Based of Froakie's white mane, I'm going to say he will not be part ground.
I'd prefer pure water over part ground. I'd love Water/Dark, Water/Dragon, Water/Flying, Even Water/Poison.
|
THANK YOU! Someone with some sense!
Water/Ground has been abused ever since Quagsire was conceived, and a Water/Ground toad by name of Seismitoad already exists. On top of that, Swampert already is a Water/Ground final evo of a starter and we do NOT need another ripoff of him like Emboar and Infernape are ripoffs of Blaziken. On that thought, PLEASE LET THE FIRE/FIGHTING CHAIN BE OVER!
I am getting SICK AND TIRED of seeing that type combo OVER AND OVER among starters. It's almost as though it will become a staple for every future game on end like that there will always be a Bug/Poison and a Grass/Poison in every generation. ENOUGH REDUNDANCY! In the cases of the others, I only see Water/Poison as a possibility that I wouldn't scream bloody murder over. I think that the others are represented fine.
And to end on a more productive note, I'm hoping for Grass/Rock or Grass/Steel Chespin because, while I dislike redundancy, I know that those combinations are dangerously underrepresented and that a Grass/Ghost or Grass/Dragon starter would be out of the question.
For Fennekin, I'd take Fire/Electric seeing as Rotom is a pathetic excuse for representing that combo. I'd take Fire/Ground but that would make Fennekin's family have a glaring disadvantage against Froakie's family. I'd love Fire/Ice as an uncovered type combination but that is about a likely as Chespin becoming Grass/Dragon, a la impossible.
And finally Froakie I'd like to see become Water/Poison and I've grown into the possibility of Water/Fighting or Water/Electric. I realize that neither Lanturn nor Poliwrath have the real threat factor that their types would suggest, so maybe Froakie could awaken the potential that Poliwrath and Lanturn couldn't.
EDIT: Hey I happen to like Excadrill. It's a much better Ground/Steel than Steelix in terms of fighting power and I find Drilbur to be cute.
Last edited by Judgmental Arceus; 01-14-2013 at 11:13 PM.
|

01-14-2013, 11:58 PM
|
 |
~Blast Burn
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New Bark Town
Posts: 5,956
|
|
Re: What You Want to See in the Starters
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judgmental Arceus
I will ABSOLUTELY NOT tolerate a psychic starter! There are too many Psychic types in existance as is. At least every generation we get a flooding of Psychic-type Pokémon, especially legendaries, who are either overpowerered trolls (evident the most in Red and Blue), or crap to use with their dangerously hindering weaknesses to Dark, Ghost, and Bug (as in every following Generation).
|
watwatwatwatwat
5th most common type, only 67 Psychic types (excluding Meloetta and Darmanitan Formes).
DEY AIN'T ENUFF PSYCHICS
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:11 AM.
|