Member List
Calendar
F.A.Q.
Search
Log Out
Pokemon Forum - Pokemon Elite 2000  
 

Go Back   Pokemon Forum - Pokemon Elite 2000 » Pokemon Main Boards » Pokemon: Black/White 2 » Pokemon: Black/White

Pokemon: Black/White Discuss the game: Pokemon Black and Pokemon White. Ask/Answer questions and discussions about Pokemon Black/White only.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 03-04-2011, 10:12 PM
Orange_Flaaffy's Avatar
Orange_Flaaffy Offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California USA
Posts: 2,136
Send a message via AIM to Orange_Flaaffy
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconoclast View Post
No, you're looking at it the wrong way. Competitive Pokemon is no different than other competitive games. For instance, think of each character in Street Fighter as a Pokemon. They all have different styles, but you have to know your matchups against an opponent. You also have to know what moves to use in which situations. Same thing with Pokemon. What movesets, abilities, and items you use changes with each generation, since there's one hundred more of the critters to analyze and fight. And some Pokemon are just suited for certain roles. You don't see Blissey, one of the best special walls in the game, going offensive like a sweeper, do you?

"Random fun" doesn't win battles in the end. It's about strategy and skill.



There are no unbeatable Pokemon. EVERY Pokemon has their weakness. Typhlosion simply doesn't have anything extraordinary going for him to qualify as a top player on an OU team. That's the thing with Pokemon, too- they have different metagames for their tiers. If other games did that, the world would be a better place.
I don't see them as characters however, I see them as highly customizable fighters that, while some roles might be the *best* if you only tailor them in one way, that 'best' takes a lot out of of the freedom someone has to make their favorites anything they feel like making them. By locking a certain pokemon into one or two sets of things they can do, and pushing everything to that limit, much of that freeform fun of the games is lost IMHO.
Personally, I wish there were just as many players that enjoyed simply battling for its own sake, not with tailor made pokemon that are basically cookie cuttered to never lose (against most enemies within type reason), but with everyday ingame, maybe not even level 100 yet, pokemon teams one against another...

I know you guys work hard to raise the sort of pokemon you do, but that kind of battling simply isn't for me. I know this most likely sounds like a much younger players mindset, but when I do get to battle my other pokemon playing friends my own age, this sort of lighthearted battling is the norm :)
__________________
*Is 28 now*

My *Fanfics*Blog* Art

Last edited by Orange_Flaaffy; 03-04-2011 at 10:24 PM.
  #17  
Old 03-04-2011, 10:17 PM
Teddiursa of the Sky's Avatar
Teddiursa of the Sky Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Terseland.
Posts: 3,068
Send a message via Skype™ to Teddiursa of the Sky
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconoclast View Post
No, you're looking at it the wrong way. Competitive Pokemon is no different than other competitive games. For instance, think of each character in Street Fighter as a Pokemon. They all have different styles, but you have to know your matchups against an opponent. You also have to know what moves to use in which situations. Same thing with Pokemon. What movesets, abilities, and items you use changes with each generation, since there's one hundred more of the critters to analyze and fight. And some Pokemon are just suited for certain roles. You don't see Blissey, one of the best special walls in the game, going offensive like a sweeper, do you?

"Random fun" doesn't win battles in the end. It's about strategy and skill.



There are no unbeatable Pokemon. EVERY Pokemon has their weakness. Typhlosion simply doesn't have anything extraordinary going for him to qualify as a top player on an OU team. That's the thing with Pokemon, too- they have different metagames for their tiers. If other games did that, the world would be a better place.
You said it yourself, there is no unbeatable Pokemon, so stop claiming starters would not make good competitive battlers, because if used right, they can be.

And what skill does it take for the game to randomly generate several numbers and statistically calculate whether or not your hyper beam hits or not? It takes no skill, you are right. And while we are on the matter of skill, why would it matter what Pokemon one has if they are so skillful? =D

- Long live Negima!
__________________
Latest Test/Work in Production:

Last edited by Teddiursa of the Sky; 03-04-2011 at 10:24 PM.
  #18  
Old 03-04-2011, 10:19 PM
Orange_Flaaffy's Avatar
Orange_Flaaffy Offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California USA
Posts: 2,136
Send a message via AIM to Orange_Flaaffy
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TitaniumAnimations View Post
You said it yourself, there is no unbeatable Pokemon, so stop claiming starters would not make good uncompetitive battlers, because if used right, they can be.
I think no pokemon is beyond hope, as if you are about to win and a last pokemon has only a tiny bit of life left, even the weak ones by level alone can throw the winning blow :)

About random fun never winning battles in the end, I have a few frozen water pokemon that would like to talk about that ;D
Maybe random fun never won against maxed out pokemon with killing set up movesets\natures you're right ^.^ (more power to them for being amazing), but I wasn't talking about those at all, just normal, caught by chance in the wild pokemon, raised on gyms and trainers in game...

I think all three B/W starters could do wonderfully. After all, starters are that for a reason, one of them being that they can be counted upon so well in many cases...
__________________
*Is 28 now*

My *Fanfics*Blog* Art

Last edited by Orange_Flaaffy; 03-04-2011 at 10:35 PM.
  #19  
Old 03-04-2011, 11:31 PM
Iconoclast's Avatar
Iconoclast Offline
Amateur Trainer
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Can I have your... autograph?
Posts: 83
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TitaniumAnimations View Post
You said it yourself, there is no unbeatable Pokemon, so stop claiming starters would not make good competitive battlers, because if used right, they can be.

And what skill does it take for the game to randomly generate several numbers and statistically calculate whether or not your hyper beam hits or not? It takes no skill, you are right. And while we are on the matter of skill, why would it matter what Pokemon one has if they are so skillful? =D

- Long live Negima!
Yes, there are no unbeatable Pokemon. But there are unwinnable matchups. A level 100 Venusaur with optimal stats and moves will NEVER win against a level 100 Skarmory with optimal stats and moves. It's that simple. You can make them anyway you want. I'm telling you the way that will get you the best chance of winning. If you don't want to play competitive Pokemon, that's fine. However, don't think your level 100 Charizard with Blast Burn, Fly, Steel Wing, and Slash is going to get you anywhere.
__________________
VPP: Sandile (Lv100@332) -+- URPG -+- Pokemon: Tabletop Adventures
  #20  
Old 03-05-2011, 12:17 AM
bigboy Offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: What do you care?
Posts: 1,606
Send a message via AIM to bigboy Send a message via MSN to bigboy
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orange_Flaaffy View Post
Meh, 'real' competitive battling is overrated to me. It's just so..set. There is seems to be only one 'right' way to raise each pokemon, certain pokemon/natures you should never use etc.
I know it seems that way, and teams with blisseys dont help.
In fact some of the funnest times I had with competitive battles were when I caught the opponent off guard when I threw out a rotom and flashed the hell out it and had it hold bright powder. Now there are too many rules....

Anyway if you really want to screw with an opponent had a pokemon that can absorb attacks. Like if lapras is out and opponent uses thunder but the turn before you switch to a ground type then they use a fighting move but lucky for you switch to ghost.

I used to love using these strageties. And while it is true not every pokemon can hold their own they are still many UU that you can use and can pack a punch.
__________________


  #21  
Old 03-05-2011, 12:27 AM
Pokemon Trainer Sarah's Avatar
Pokemon Trainer Sarah Offline
Expecto Patronum!
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Route 1
Posts: 8,137
Send a message via AIM to Pokemon Trainer Sarah Send a message via MSN to Pokemon Trainer Sarah
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

I usually use all three starters at some point, because they tend to be my favourite Pokemon of any particular generation. I think they'd definitely be useful and you should be able to get through the game pretty easily with all three. As for IVS and natures etc., they're not really important if you're just playing through the game. If you like all the starters then you should go for it, but if not, I'm sure you could find and train other Pokemon who would end up just as good if not better. =)
  #22  
Old 03-05-2011, 01:49 AM
Orange_Flaaffy's Avatar
Orange_Flaaffy Offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California USA
Posts: 2,136
Send a message via AIM to Orange_Flaaffy
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboy View Post
I know it seems that way, and teams with blisseys dont help.
In fact some of the funnest times I had with competitive battles were when I caught the opponent off guard when I threw out a rotom and flashed the hell out it and had it hold bright powder. Now there are too many rules....

Anyway if you really want to screw with an opponent had a pokemon that can absorb attacks. Like if lapras is out and opponent uses thunder but the turn before you switch to a ground type then they use a fighting move but lucky for you switch to ghost.

I used to love using these strageties. And while it is true not every pokemon can hold their own they are still many UU that you can use and can pack a punch.
That's all I mean, just a little bit of spice. It gives more of a feeling of anime battling tome (without of course those moves they use that certain pokemon can't actually learn in the game)
__________________
*Is 28 now*

My *Fanfics*Blog* Art
  #23  
Old 03-05-2011, 02:49 AM
Judgmental Arceus's Avatar
Judgmental Arceus Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Your front door with a loaded P90
Posts: 7,534
Send a message via Yahoo to Judgmental Arceus Send a message via Skype™ to Judgmental Arceus
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

Not being a competative battler myself I can't argue any side of the matter. I do try my best to acquire every starter after my journey but concerning me playing Hoenn and Sinnoh, some starters are more suitable for some gameplay than others. I mean in the case of Unova: Snivy's line (though I'm no fan of Grass-types as they suck typewise) can hold a defensive set, Tepig's line can hold a more Physical-based attack set, and Oshawott's line can hold a Special-based attack set.

And for those who want to argue that starters suck competitively, tell that to Blaziken, Infernape, Empoleon, and Swampert.
__________________
Credit to mayfan1000. VPP Browser Post
  #24  
Old 03-05-2011, 08:05 AM
Teddiursa of the Sky's Avatar
Teddiursa of the Sky Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Terseland.
Posts: 3,068
Send a message via Skype™ to Teddiursa of the Sky
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconoclast View Post
Yes, there are no unbeatable Pokemon. But there are unwinnable matchups. A level 100 Venusaur with optimal stats and moves will NEVER win against a level 100 Skarmory with optimal stats and moves. It's that simple. You can make them anyway you want. I'm telling you the way that will get you the best chance of winning. If you don't want to play competitive Pokemon, that's fine. However, don't think your level 100 Charizard with Blast Burn, Fly, Steel Wing, and Slash is going to get you anywhere.
You cannot say something of that sort, because it has happened before. Try watching battle casts on Youtube, and you will see some amazing and unlikely match ups. You can't make sweeping generalizations like that.

- Long live Negima!
__________________
Latest Test/Work in Production:
  #25  
Old 03-19-2011, 05:05 AM
Hikari10's Avatar
Hikari10 Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 35
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skylands View Post
You could always borrow a sibling or friend's DS, though. That's what I usually do. If you are unable to, then yes go right ahead and get yourself another DS.
Yes, I often stole my brother's DS (he doesn't play it much anymore.) to trade Pokemon when I need to. That's how I got all the Johto starters in SoulSilver and all the Sinnoh starters in Pearl and Platinum. I'm getting both Black and White 'cos my brother just doesn't have any Poke interest anymore. I'm planning trading between both games so I can get all the starters.
  #26  
Old 03-19-2011, 06:18 AM
PokeMech Offline
New Trainer
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

To the OP poster, do you really need all three starter to be good in game? No. I didn't even use my starting pokemon after I got about 1/4 of the way through the game. You can find better pokemons out there for in-game...and competitive use. If you want to really battle. and I mean serious online, 6 on 6 competitive battles where you have reasonable chance of winning. You have to learn to breed, EV train, and start reading up on strategies and movesets and team building. Or you can learn to use Pokesav or Pokegen.
  #27  
Old 03-19-2011, 06:28 AM
Professor Geoffrey's Avatar
Professor Geoffrey Offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: My laboratory.
Posts: 6,512
Send a message via AIM to Professor Geoffrey
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

What would really be cool is if the third version for Black and White did what they did in Pokémon Yellow, as Black and White can obviously seen as a new beginning parallel to Red and Blue/Green. For example, make a girl/boy character be the sibling, and Cheren, Bianca and the sibling choose the starters, and you get some other Pokémon, for instance, Zorua or Emolga. That would be interesting. o:

^ By the way, this is an idea for a fanfiction I'm doing, so no one steal it. Unless you're the Pokémon company, because you've already stolen my ideas. =/

~Professor Geoffrey
__________________
❒ SINGLE ❒ TAKEN ✔ LAPRAS RIDER
The Professor of Pokémon Elite 2000.
  #28  
Old 03-19-2011, 08:11 AM
Tsujin's Avatar
Tsujin Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kanto, Texas
Posts: 1,583
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor Geoffrey View Post
What would really be cool is if the third version for Black and White did what they did in Pokémon Yellow, as Black and White can obviously seen as a new beginning parallel to Red and Blue/Green. For example, make a girl/boy character be the sibling, and Cheren, Bianca and the sibling choose the starters, and you get some other Pokémon, for instance, Zorua or Emolga. That would be interesting. o:

^ By the way, this is an idea for a fanfiction I'm doing, so no one steal it. Unless you're the Pokémon company, because you've already stolen my ideas. =/

~Professor Geoffrey
Lol, that would be pretty awesome. And then you got all 3 starters from different people and then could add the building from the anime into the game somewhere. Like the Battle Building where Ash got Pokab...erm I mean Tepig from. And then getting Snivy after seeing someone abandon it like Charmander. I don't know about Oshawott though. It just kinda followed Ash. xD Wonder how you would play that out. It'd be interesting to see who the new Pikachu would be if that were the case though.
__________________
VPP Stats | -- -- Evolves @ 1395 - Level 100 @ 1575


| Friend Codes / Trade Thread / Battle Log |
| Me IRL / Pokerus Empire / YouTube |
  #29  
Old 03-19-2011, 09:31 AM
Saraibre Ryu's Avatar
Saraibre Ryu Offline
Drasconis Deviantus
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Voids of my mind
Posts: 6,530
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconoclast View Post
Yes, there are no unbeatable Pokemon. But there are unwinnable matchups. A level 100 Venusaur with optimal stats and moves will NEVER win against a level 100 Skarmory with optimal stats and moves. It's that simple. You can make them anyway you want. I'm telling you the way that will get you the best chance of winning. If you don't want to play competitive Pokemon, that's fine. However, don't think your level 100 Charizard with Blast Burn, Fly, Steel Wing, and Slash is going to get you anywhere.
You really shouldn't generalize. The Pokemon games are NEVER that simple. Optimal Pokemon is within the eye of the beholder. All the Pokemon I have are optimal in my eyes, but in another's, they may not be.

I've had my in-game improperly EV trained, not really ideal natured Charizard take out an Arceus online on her own. I've had my Ariados take out LATIOS, had my Flareon make fools of Garchomp, and I've had my Torterra pull out a win against a two on one double battle match against a Ice Beam spamming Milotic, and status effect abusing Crobat, to name a few examples. I'm sure you'd would of thought the other would of won but that isn't the case Mr. Unwinnable match ups.

And no, I am no cheater, there is no fun in cheating and I wasn't battling noobs who didn't know what they were doing either.

You can be surprised about what people come up with outside the competitive battling mold. I honestly look at the molds people have set as a standard and try not to use them. I like being creative and thinking outside the box, and I still manage to win many battles, however Pokemon isn't all about winning, it's about having fun.

My 'random fun' has won me plenty of battles in competitive areas and I think it's because it's not what people expect. What takes skill is being able to use an unthought of moveset effectively, not what everyone else is gonna use for the same Pokemon. If everyone uses the same thing and is told how to use it, that's not skill, that's following someone elses steps. Someone makes a good moveset, then everyone follows because it's the 'best'.

You play with your favorites, and they work for you. I work hard to make my Pokemon work for me and even though they don't follow this competitive mold, they do very well when I bother to visit the place.

If all three starters appeal to you, I say hell yeah, go for it.
__________________
Code:
VPP STATS Paired with: Sandstorm Lavastone <3 Neon the Jolteon Level100: 6576
  #30  
Old 03-23-2011, 01:34 PM
Pokemon Master draco Offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 57
Default Re: Starting with all 3 starters?

tbh i have all 3 starters on black only because of pokedex, i beat game with oshawott,reset and used my catch trainer pokemon action replay code to catch cheren and biancas starters at lvl 5... they look legit as well, found in twinleaf town,ot is my name all are met at lvl 5 etc.
__________________
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Style Design: AlienSector.com