Originally Posted by Teddiursa of the Sky
First and foremost, Obama did not kill anyone. Second of all, as far as I can tell, he did not specifically say that he supported the killing of U.S citizens using drones.
First and foremost, it's his kill list (and the kid's not even on the kill list). If I ordered the assassination of a particular person, how am I not responsible for that person's death? Obama has in fact killed US citizens aboard indirectly through the use of drones.
So the drone strike on a US citizen in Yemen means what to you? Again, I'm not arguing whether or not he's said anything (he didn't), but rather again he's already done it. You can't say "I disapprove of using drones against US citizens" (he didn't even say that), then turn around and use drones against a US citizen and still be credible for it. His actions have already supported this claim, because he's done it already. He's already killed US citizens aboard with drones.
Don't get me wrong, I'm certain Romney is no better, if not worse than, Obama on these policies.